libreoffice openoffice bug hackers to spoof

“The longer the schism between the versions goes on, the more users will ultimately suffer,” Espinoza added. “It’s better than Oracle trying to retain it, but it’s far worse than simply giving it to the Document Foundation.

“What just happened here is that Oracle couldn’t resist giving the community the finger one more time,” Hyperlogos blogger Martin Espinoza told Linux Girl. But since when does logic necessarily come into the picture?ĭoing her best to leave her disbelief in a state of suspension, Linux Girl took to the streets of the blogosphere to learn more about what had just happened. Given its LibreOffice fork, the Document Foundation would certainly have been a logical choice.

What we didn’t know, however, was which group would be the lucky recipient. We’ve known for some time, of course, that Oracle had decided to relinquish OpenOffice to non-commercial status. “The Apache Software Foundation’s model makes it possible for commercial and individual volunteer contributors to collaborate on open source product development.” Eschewing the Obvious “Donating to Apache gives this popular consumer software a mature, open, and well established infrastructure to continue well into the future,” said Luke Kowalski, a vice president with Oracle’s Corporate Architecture Group. The latest was felt last week, when Oracle decided to snub the Document Foundation and give the software suite to the Apache Software Foundation instead. Regarding, in particular, it’s been one hair-raising twist and turn after another. How else, after all, would we get the opportunity to ride on a thrilling emotional roller coaster such as the one Oracle’s had us on since it acquired Sun? Things are never dull here in the Linux blogosphere, but there’s no doubt they would be a whole lot less entertaining without Oracle.

Libreoffice openoffice bug hackers to spoof